Third Battle of Panipat (1761) | Date, Causes Result, Effects

November 6, 2024
third battle of panipat
Quick Summary

Quick Summary

  • The Third Battle of Panipat, fought on January 14, 1761, was a major conflict between the Maratha Empire and the Durrani Empire led by Ahmad Shah Durrani.
  • The battle fought in present-day Haryana, resulted in a devastating defeat for the Marathas, significantly weakening their influence in northern India.
  • Despite the Marathas’ strategic ambitions, poor tactics and lack of coordination led to heavy casualties on both sides, with the Marathas losing a large portion of their army.
  • This battle marked the end of Afghan invasions in India and shifted the region’s power balance, paving the way for British dominance.

Table of Contents

The Third Battle of Panipat

The Third Battle of Panipat was fought between the Durrani Empire and The Maratha Empire in Haryana. Panipat is an ancient town 90 km from Delhi. Panipat’s strategic location made it the site of important conflicts and commercial routes.

Even though this location has seen several engagements, the third battle of Panipat is the most well-known. On January 14, 1761, the Durrani and Maratha empires engaged in combat. Because of its influence on the Indian subcontinent, the East India Company’s sphere of influence expanded and the power dynamics in the region shifted. Today, Panipat still holds historic significance and is a place for visitors to come and explore its rich past.

The Third Battle of Panipat History

After a violent 27-year war between the Mughals and Marathas from 1680 to 1707, the Mughal Empire grew weaker and the Maratha Empire grew stronger. A Maratha leader named Peshwa Baji Rao expanded the Maratha Empire by annexing Gujarat and Malwa. Subsequently, in 1737, Baji Rao defeated the Mughals in the vicinity of Delhi and seized control of a large area of Mughal territory south of Delhi.

Ahmad Shah Abdali, the ruler of Afghanistan, became upset about this since he also desired that territory. Thus, Ahmad Shah Abdali established the Durrani Empire in Afghanistan and seized control of Lahore, Pakistan, in 1747. Punjab and Sindh were among the regions he also took control of. His son, Timur Shah, oversaw Lahore. However, Timur Shah lost Lahore to Maratha Peshwa Bajirao.

Ahmad Shah Abdali defeated numerous Maratha forts in Punjab in 1759 by rallying an army of Pashtuns. At the time, the Mughals’ weakness limited Delhi’s power. Many asked Abdali to put an end to the Marathas because they were afraid they would grow even larger. To combat the Marathas, Abdali then joined forces with his Indian allies, the Rohilla Afghans of the Gangetic Doab.

The Third Battle of Panipat was fought between

Third Battle of Panipat was fought between

On January 14, 1761, a major and brutal battle known as the Third Battle of Panipat took place in the northern Indian region of Panipat. The Durrani Empire, commanded by Ahmad Shah Durrani, also referred to as Ahmad Shah Abdali, and the Maratha Empire engaged in combat. The Marathas suffered a massive defeat in this fight that had never before happened in Indian history. The sub-continent was going through a transformational era at the time this conflict was fought, making the period crucial.

The history and direction of South Asia were shifting at this time when the Mughal Empire was on the verge of being extinct and new subcontinental nations were rising to take the throne. Due to the Mughals’ ineptitude, autonomous parties like as the French, British, Sikhs, Marathas, and others were vying for the crown that was soon to be relinquished.

Following Ahmad Shah Abdali’s invasion of India, a coalition of Indian warriors commanded by the Marathas rose in opposition to him. Both sides suffered heavy casualties in this vicious and intense conflict. In the end, the Durrani armies prevailed. This victory had far-reaching effects because it made the Maratha Empire weaker and opened the door for the British East India Company to eventually gain power in India.

The Third Battle of Panipat’s direct impact on the Maratha Empire is not as well-known as its subsequent ramifications. The rise of British colonial authority and the fall of indigenous forces occurred at a critical juncture in Indian history. This fight demonstrates the complex military and political strategies that molded the Indian subcontinent in the eighteenth century and influenced the future of the country for a long time.

Third battle of Panipat start date

The Third Battle of Panipat began on January 14, 1761. This battle was fought between the Maratha Empire and the Durrani Empire, led by Ahmad Shah Abdali, and is one of the most significant conflicts in Indian history. The date marks the beginning of a fierce struggle that would have lasting effects on the political landscape of India.

The Third Battle of Panipat Significance

The Maratha dynasty destroyed the Mughal dynasty at the beginning of 1752. Although Durrani was already in power in Punjab and had aspirations for a better India, they still wanted to take that province. Following the removal of Durrani’s representatives by the Marathas, the Afghan army selected Delhi as their capital. For the Marathas, the third battle of Panipat proved to be disastrous.

This battle demonstrated the possibility that the Mughal dynasty would lose its hold on power in India. Additionally, because the Afghan leaders were more concerned with other matters than consolidating their power, the British government was able to gain more sway in India. Because it put an end to the Mughals’ and Marathas’ ambitions, this battle was crucial to world history. The Maratha army was routed by the Durrani army.

Causes of the Third Battle of Panipat

The question always arises, what were the causes of the third battle of panipat? let’s discuss below

The Third Battle of Panipat significantly impacted India’s history. The following are the main reasons behind the Third Battle of Panipat:

1. Revolution in the Mughal dynasty

A significant part of the Indian subcontinent was under the rule of the Mughal Empire, which started to disintegrate in the 18th century. The Mughal emperors were weak and could not maintain their authority. Also, their empire was fragmented into many semi-autonomous regions. The Marathas saw their downfall as a chance to increase their power.

2. Power of Marathas 

By this point, the Marathas had become powerful in India and had control over a big portion of it. This along with their military prowess challenged the existing power structure. While extending their influence, The Marathas ran into a lot of conflict with regional powers including the Mughals.                

3. Internal dispute

There were a lot of internal disputes and divisions within the Maratha Empire. Because of this, they were in a weaker position and found it more challenging to stand as one against external challenges to the empire. One of the reasons for the war was this conflict going on in the Maratha Empire

4. The religion of Marathas

Religion played a big role in this whole conflict. The Marathas were Hindu and the Durrani Empire followed Islam. The differences in their religions gave way to a sense of religious conflict. This, in no way, was the reason for the battle as the intentions behind it were mostly political and territorial.

5. Request to Durrani

Ahmad Shah Durrani, leader of the Durrani Empire was asked for assistance in the battle by the Mughal Empire. Shah Jahan III, The Mughal emperor at the time asked for Durani; ‘s aid who was in Delhi to fight against the Marathas. Durrani used to rule over present-day Afghanistan and Pakistan and viewed this as an opportunity to regain control over the northern territories. In the end, Durrani won and turned the course of Indian history.

The Third Battle of Panipat was the culmination of these causes coming together. Despite their might, Ahmad Shah Durrani’s alliance of warriors entered India to halt the Maratha advance and help the faltering Mughal Empire. Both sides suffered substantial losses in the hard-fought conflict. When Ahmad Shah Durrani’s armies ultimately prevailed, Indian history underwent a sea change.

This conflict had far-reaching effects. It severely undermined the Mughal Dynasty’s already waning power and crippled the Maratha Empire. These powers’ void allowed the East India Company to grow to prominence, which in turn brought to British colonial authority in India. The Third Battle of Panipat is still said to be a significant event in Indian history because of the way it combined military, political, and religious components.

Also Read:

The Battle of Haldighati on 18 June 1576: A Simple Overview

The Battle of Panipat | All three Battles From 1526 to 1761

Who won the third battle of Panipat?                                  

The winners of the Third Battle of Panipat were the Durrani Empire, led by Ahmad Shah Durrani, also known as Ahmad Shah Abdali. Ahmad Shah Abdali’s soldiers were victorious from the fight with great decisiveness. The Durrani army engaged the Maratha Empire in this conflict, led by Sadashivrao Bhau. There were heavy deaths on both sides of the vicious combat. But in the end, the army of Ahmad Shah Abdali triumphed. The Marathas’ dominion suffered greatly as a result of their decisive loss.

Ahmed Shah Durrani won the Third battle of Panipat

1. Reasons for Afghan Victory

  • Numerical Superiority: The Afghan forces, led by Ahmad Shah Durrani, outnumbered the Marathas.
  • Support from Shuja-ud-Daulah: Financial aid from Shuja-ud-Daulah enabled the Afghans to sustain their campaign in northern India.
  • Distance from Maratha Base: The Marathas’ base in Pune was far from the battlefield, hindering their supply lines.
  • Afghan Offensive at Baghpat: Durrani crossed the Yamuna at Baghpat, cutting off Maratha supplies from Delhi.
  • Siege of Panipat: The Afghans laid siege to the Maratha camp, blocking their food supplies.
  • Starvation and Weakening Morale: By January 1761, the Marathas suffered from severe food shortages, leading to rumors of starvation and declining morale.

2. Reasons for Maratha’s Defeat

  • Sadashiv Rao was of no importance to the Maratha General. The Marathas found his authoritarian demeanor annoying. Bhao is alleged to have been so stubborn, haughty, harsh, and self-assured.
  • Panipat mission suffered as a result of his influence. Not because they respected him, but rather because of their dread of him, his harshness made them comply.  He was deemed partially or fully accountable for the defeat because he was the Maratha force’s commander.
  • Bhau could not keep good ties with Ahmad Shah Abdali’s ardent adversaries, the Sikhs. Second, he engaged in heroic combat on the battlefield rather than leading the charge.
  • Thirdly, he was unable to effectively utilize his artillery and cavalry and failed to maintain a reserve force. Furthermore, he entered the conflict without a clear plan in place, refusing to employ a military strategy.

Effect of the Third Battle of Panipat

  • The Afghan army killed tens of thousands of Maratha soldiers and civilians in Panipat’s streets after the battle. The defeated women and children were sold as slaves in camps in Afghanistan. A day following the battle, around 40,000 Maratha captives were ruthlessly killed.
  • Among the fighters who lost their lives were Sadashivrao Bhau and Vishwasrao, the son of Peshwa. Balaji Bajirao, the Peshwa, never entirely got over the shock of what had happened. Both sides suffered a great deal of loss of life.
  • The Maratha rebellion was put down, but under Peshwa Madhavrao, they recaptured Delhi ten years later. In Delhi, he reinstated Mughal Shah Alam II as emperor.
  • The battle left the Maratha homeland insecure for around 10 years and stopped them from making further inroads toward the north. During these 10 years, Peshwa Madhavrao is credited with regaining Maratha power after the setback at Panipat, making his tenure noteworthy.
  • A decade after Panipat, in 1771, Peshwa Madhavrao led a large Maratha force into North India to punish rulers who had either accepted Maratha dominance after Panipat or had colluded with the Afghans. Among these rulers were the Rohillas. One may consider Panipat’s long history to have come to an end with this campaign’s success.

Why Panipat was a strategic choice for major battles?

Several factors made Panipat a strategic choice for major battles throughout history:

  • Proximity to Delhi: Situated roughly 100 kilometers north of Delhi, Panipat offered a crucial advantage for rulers of the capital. They could easily transport troops, supplies, and weaponry to the battlefield, ensuring logistical support and protecting their seat of power.
  • Open Terrain: The vast, flat plains surrounding Panipat provided ideal ground for large-scale battles. This open landscape facilitated the movement of cavalry, a vital component of warfare in the pre-modern era.
  • Grand Trunk Road Access: Panipat’s location on the Grand Trunk Road, a major highway built by Sher Shah Suri, was another strategic advantage. Invading armies from the northwest could easily access this expansive plain, making it a convenient staging ground for campaigns.

In essence, Panipat’s proximity to Delhi, open terrain, and accessibility via the Grand Trunk Road all contributed to its significance as a historic battleground in India.

Earlier Battles of Panipat

The Battles of Panipat were significant turning points in Indian history, shaping the subcontinent’s political landscape.

  • The First Battle of Panipat (1526) was fought on April 21, 1526, this battle marked the beginning of the Mughal Empire in India. It was fought between Babur, the founder of the Mughal Empire, and Ibrahim Lodi of the Delhi Sultanate. Babur’s victory, aided by superior military tactics and artillery, laid the foundation for Mughal rule in India.
  • The Second Battle of Panipat (1556) occurred on November 5, 1556, this battle was fought between the Mughal Empire, under the young Akbar, and the forces of Hemu, a Hindu king challenging Mughal dominance. Akbar, guided by his regent Bairam Khan, emerged victorious, reinforcing Mughal control and expanding their empire.

These battles set the stage for the third, and most decisive, conflict at Panipat in 1761, continuing the series of clashes that dramatically shaped India’s history.

Conclusion and Legacy of the Third Battle of Panipat

In summary, the Third Battle of Panipat changed the direction of Indian history. It involved a mix of politics, religion, and military strategies, leading to the British gaining control of India. The effects of the battle lasted a long time, shaping how power and leadership worked in the region. Even today, Panipat is an important historical site, welcoming visitors to learn about the significant events that took place there.

Frequently Asked Questions: Third battle of panipat

Why was the 3rd Battle of Panipat important?

The Third Battle of Panipat was crucial due to its impact on political, military, and cultural aspects, contributing to the shaping of India’s history and influencing the dynamics of power in the region.

How did the Second Battle of Panipat affect the Mughal Empire?

Winning the Second Battle of Panipat was more than a victory for Akbar; it was a turning point that ushered in a golden era for the Mughal Empire. Akbar’s leadership, the empire’s expansion, and a cultural renaissance all began with this pivotal battle.

What happened at Panipat in 1556?

In 1556, there was a fight called the Second Battle of Panipat in northern India. The Mughal emperor, Akbar, fought against a Hindu king named Hemu. Akbar won with the help of his advisor Bairam Khan. This victory made Akbar a strong leader, and it led to a good time for the Mughal Empire with more culture, land, and better organization. The battle was a turning point for the Mughal Empire.

How many Marathas died during the Battle of Panipat?

The exact number of Marathas who died in the Battle of Panipat in 1761 is unclear. Thousands of soldiers from both sides faced heavy casualties in the intense conflict. While the exact count is uncertain.

Who fought in the Battle of Panipat?

The Battle of Panipat, fought on January 14, 1761, saw Ahmad Shah Durrani’s Durrani Empire clash with the Maratha Empire led by Sadashivrao Bhau in Panipat. This pivotal battle had profound consequences for the Maratha Confederacy and the Indian subcontinent’s political landscape.

Who was the Mughal emperor during the Third Battle of Panipat

The Mughal emperor during the Third Battle of Panipat was Shah Alam II. This battle, which occurred on January 14, 1761, was fought between the Marathas and the Afghans led by Ahmad Shah Durrani.

Why did Ahmad Shah Abdali never return to India?

Despite his victory at Panipat, Ahmad Shah Abdali suffered heavy losses and feared Maratha reinforcements. He sent a letter to the Peshwa, praising his son’s bravery and proposing a border settlement, showing no interest in Maratha territory.

Got a question on this topic?