Quick Summary
India’s constitutional journey has a separate place for the 42 Amendment of Indian Constitution. This Amendment altered Indian law and politics. During the political unrest of the mid-1970s, authorities adopted it to maintain national sovereignty, integrity, and unity. The 42 Amendment of Indian Constitution introduced some changes in the Preamble. It added fundamental duties and moved powers between the central and state governments. This Amendment declared the Directive Principles of State Policy supreme over fundamental rights. The Preamble laid out goals to create a government with more power to act, reflecting values like equality and welfare for people and promoting things like representation and liberty for citizens.
Many find the 42 Amendment of Indian Constitution to be notable. It stands out for several reasons to historians, lawyers, and people interested in how India’s Constitution has changed. There’s a fascinating political history leading up to this Amendment. Understanding that background can help clarify why the Amendment created controversy and debate in the 1970s.
In the mid-1970s, India was politically and socially unstable, prompting this modification. Before the 42 Amendment of the Indian Constitution 1976 happened, India was going through an uncertain period politically. The country faced a declared emergency state with growing concerns about national unity. To strengthen the central government and limit judicial oversight, they brought about this. These included changing the Preamble to reflect India as a socialist and secular country more clearly. Many perceived the 42nd Amendment Act as a move toward centralization and less freedom. In India’s constitutional history, people still consider this chapter controversial.
The Mini Constitution is another name for the 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution. During the Emergency in 1976, they put it into effect. It was among the most important Constitutional amendments. It altered a lot of significant things, such as:
Provisions | Modifications |
Article 32A | refused the Supreme Court the authority to evaluate whether the State law was constitutional. |
Article 131A | conferred exclusive authority on the Supreme Court to decide whether a central law is constitutional. |
Article 144A | To determine whether a Central or State law is constitutional, the Supreme Court sets a minimum of seven judges. A two-thirds majority of the judges had to vote for the law to be declared unconstitutional. The authority of the High Court to grant writs “for any other purpose” was subject to some limitations. |
Parliament | The State Legislative Assemblies and Lok Sabha had six-year terms.It made it possible for the Center to send troops into the state to handle disputes involving law and order (Article 257A). Special discretionary powers were granted to the Prime Minister and the Speaker of the Lok Sabha (Article 329A). The Parliament and state legislatures no longer required a quorum. The power to determine the rights and privileges of its members and committees was granted to the Parliament. |
Executive | The terms of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies were for six years. It enabled the Center to address conflicts about law and order by deploying troops into the state (Article 257A). The Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Prime Minister each have special discretionary powers (Article 329A). A majority of members were no longer necessary for the state legislatures or the Parliament. The Parliament was given the authority to decide what the privileges and rights of its committees and members would be. |
Judiciary | The judicial review authority of the High Courts was limited. enabled for the All-India Judicial Service to be established. |
Federalism | Article 257A gave the Center the authority to use any Union armed force in any State to address a serious law and order issue. |
Preamble | The Preamble was amended to include “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.” |
Fundamental Rights | All Directive Principles took precedence over the Fundamental Rights mentioned in Articles 14, 19, or 31. |
Directive Principles of State Policy | Fundamental Rights were subordinated to Directive Principles, and any laws passed by the Parliament in this regard were excluded from the Court’s judicial review. Article 39: To provide chances for kids to develop properly. Article 39A: To advance equitable justice and give the underprivileged free legal assistance.Article 43A: To take action to ensure that employees are involved in industry management.Article 48A: to preserve and enhance the natural environment, as well as to protect wildlife and forests. |
Fundamental Duties | The government established the Swaran Singh Committee in 1976, and its recommendations are outlined in Article 51-A under Part IV-A, which outlines citizens’ Fundamental Duties. The 11th Fundamental Duty, which states that a parent or guardian must provide educational opportunities for their child or ward between the ages of six and fourteen, was added by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act. |
Emergency | Anywhere in the nation, the President could declare an emergency. |
Seventh Schedule | The following categories were transferred from the State list to the Concurrent list: education, forests, conservation of wild animals and birds, weights and measures, administration of justice, constitution, and organization of all courts—with the exception of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. |
Tribunals | Education, forests, conservation of wild animals and birds, weights and measures, administration of justice, constitution, and organization of all courts—apart from the Supreme Court and the High Courts—were among the categories that were moved from the State list to the Concurrent list. |
Amended Article 102 (1)(a) | To disqualify offices vesting in Parliament rather than in State Legislatures, it seeks to provide that an individual will be disqualified if he holds any such profit-making office under the Government of India or the Government of any State as declared by Parliamentary law. |
In 1976, the 42nd Amendment gave Parliament more power. At the time, some saw this as controversial. The Amendment added new principles and duties for citizens to follow in the Preamble section. But critics worried the changes could weaken India’s system of checks and balances in government that protect people’s rights and voices. The 43rd Amendment later removed most of the additions to the Preamble. Still, the period when the 42nd was in effect stands out as a significant time in India’s constitutional history.
Also Read:-
The 44th Amendment of the Indian Constitution: An Overview
The Parts of Indian Constitution: A Comprehensive Guide
Amendment in Indian Constitution: An Overview
104 Amendment of the Indian Constitution
India’s constitutional history has a special place for the 42nd Amendment of 1976. The government made several significant reforms and changes to consolidate its authority and promote secularism, social fairness, and economic equality. Key 42nd Amendment goals:
The 42nd Amendment empowered the central government. In emergencies, it gave the central government additional influence over the states.
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 stands as one of the most far-reaching amendments to the Indian Constitution. Its impact was significant and multifaceted:
Critics argued that these changes tilted the balance of power excessively in favor of the central government and the Prime Minister, potentially undermining the federal structure and democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution.
In contrast to other amendments that focused on specific aspects of the Constitution, the 42nd Amendment aimed for a more comprehensive reshaping of the power structure. However, its approach proved controversial, sparking debate about the appropriate balance between central authority and individual rights in India.
The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 stands as a corrective measure to the controversial 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. Here’s how they are related:
Understanding this amendment’s provisions and the debates it sparked is crucial for UPSC aspirants.
The 42nd Amendment of the Indian Constitution was a response to mid-1970s political and social turbulence. The main factors were corruption, factionalism, and emergency. The Amendment centralized authority and strengthened secularism and socialism. It also established citizen obligations to solve these issues.
The 42nd Amendment Act majorly affected the Indian legal system as a whole. It restricted the judiciary’s ability to contest constitutional modifications and emphasized Parliament’s supremacy. It also set up special courts to settle administrative disputes. And it expanded what the government could do during emergencies. The Amendment aimed to promote local self-governance to increase fairness, like reserving school and government spots for marginalized populations. However, many saw the 42nd Amendment as controversial.
During the Emergency, the Centre passed the 42nd Amendment Act to grant more power to itself. It sought to strengthen the government and minimize judicial oversight.
Many 42nd Amendment Act provisions were studied and revised. The 43rd and 44th Amendments Act of 1978 removed several problematic provisions from it. This aimed to restore fundamental liberties and the center-state balance.
The 42nd Amendment Act changed the Preamble to stress India’s socialist and secular nature. It also restricted fundamental liberties. However, this Amendment increased executive power over the courts and state governments.
This amendment significantly boosted central government authority and weakened state governments.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) amended the Preamble, incorporating the words socialist, secular, and integrity.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act reduced the president’s powers by making them bound to the advice of the cabinet and empowered the central government to deploy forces in states during law and order crises.
Got a question on this topic?
Chegg India does not ask for money to offer any opportunity with the company. We request you to be vigilant before sharing your personal and financial information with any third party. Beware of fraudulent activities claiming affiliation with our company and promising monetary rewards or benefits. Chegg India shall not be responsible for any losses resulting from such activities.
Chegg India does not ask for money to offer any opportunity with the company. We request you to be vigilant before sharing your personal and financial information with any third party. Beware of fraudulent activities claiming affiliation with our company and promising monetary rewards or benefits. Chegg India shall not be responsible for any losses resulting from such activities.
© 2024 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved.