The Battle of Panipat | All three Battles From 1526 to 1761

The Battle of Panipat History

Panipat has been the site of three crucial historical confrontations known as the Battles of Panipat. The location of Panipat holds a significant position in Indian history. It has witnessed the establishment of the Mughal Empire and three military engagements. The Battle of Panipat led to the uprooting of many dynasties. Do you know how many Battles of Panipat had taken place? 3 Battles of Panipat took place.

You should also know about the Battle of Panipat 1, 2, and 3 dates. The first battle of Panipat happened on 20th April, 1526. The second and the third Battles occurred in 1556 and 1761, respectively. Each battle has its own story and its significance. The last battle deepened the roots of Britishers in India.

Where is Panipat?

Panipat is located in the North of Delhi. Its historic name was Panduprastha, one of the five cities founded by the Pandavas during the times of Mahabharata. Since then, it has had an important historical significance. The Battles of Panipat were a turning point in medieval history and continued till modern history.

First Battle of Panipat (April 20, 1526)

The first Battle of Panipat took place on April 20, 1526. The first battle of Panipat was fought between Babur and Ibrahim Lodi. It led to the establishment of the Mughal dynasty and the end of the Delhi sultanate. When Babur marched out for Lahore, the Lodi army also marched and routed. Babur placed Alam Khan as the governor, who was one of the rebel uncles of Ibrahim Lodi. But Alam Khan was soon displaced, and Babur supplied Alam Khan with troops. Babur realized that Ibrahim would not allow him to conquer Punjab.

Babur’s forces comprised around 15,000 men with 20 – 24 field artillery pieces. There were 30,000 – 40,000 men in Ibrahim’s army, along with the 1000 elephants. Babur’s army used guns, but Ibrahim Lodi was unaware of any field artillery. The sounds of the cannons used to frighten the war elephants of Ibrahim Lodi. The tactics of Tulughma and Araba worked in the favour of Babur.

The feudatories and generals of Ibrahim Lodi abandoned him in the middle of a war and changed their parties. Babur’s army defeated Lodi’s army, and Ibrahim Lodi died on the battleground. Babur established the Mughal dynasty. The Lodi dynasty ended with the end of this war.

Background of the First Battle of Panipat

Ibrahim Lodi was the third ruler of the Lodi dynasty and was unpopular among the nobles. He used to persecute and execute old nobles. Daulat Khan appealed to Babur to save his life. Babur was the Timurid ruler of Kabul.

He originally belonged to the Fergana district. But later, two powers occupied the region – the Safavids of Iran and the Uzbeks of Central Asia. He moved to Kabul in 1504 after losing Samarkand three times. He had raided the northwestern frontier of India four times between 1504 and 1524. His started dreaming of a new empire across the east of the Indus. He got this opportunity when Afghan chiefs invited him.

Overview of the First Battle of Panipat 

First Battle of Panipat At Glance
Date	20 April 1526
Location	Panipat, Haryana
Forces	Mughal Ruler Babur & Ibrahim Lodi The Babur forces comprised around 15,000 men and 20 – 24 artillery pieces. Ibrahim Lodi had around 10,000 men and 1000 war elephants.
Result	The Mughal Empire defeated the Lodi dynasty. The end of the Lodi dynasty marked the end of the Delhi Sultanate. The Mughal dynasty was established with Babur as the first ruler.

What are the advantages of using Cannons in the Battle?

The first Battle of Panipat was one of the earliest Battles in which Babur used gunpowder firearms and field artillery. The cannons and artillery played a decisive role in the victory of the battle of Babur. This was one of the reasons why the Lodi dynasty ended. The Lodi dynasty was much more dependent on the traditional mode of warfare, but these cannons gave Babur an edge over Lodi’s army.

There are certain advantages of using cannons in Medieval warfare.

1. Psychological Impact on Troops

The sound of cannons was so loud that the war elephants of Ibrahim Lodi got scared and trampled Lodi’s army. Its loud noise used to confuse the army, which could cause them to lose concentration.

2. Structural Impact on Fortifications

The introduction of artillery in the field had a structural impact on fortifications. Babur had used four types of cannons in the war – light cannon, heavy cannon, siege cannon, and anti-personal gun. Cannons used stone shots, and they shattered on impact. They produced lethal shrapnel as a secondary effect. Babur had 20 cannons in total on the field.

3. Changing Dynamics of Battlefield Strategy

Tulughama and Araba were two tactics of Babur. Tulughma means dividing the army into small subunits on the field. The center-forward army was provided with carts. Cannons were placed behind them for easy maneuver. They could be fired without any fear of being hit because the bullock carts were held in place. The nozzles of the cannons can also be easily changed.

Reasons Behind Babur’s Victory in the First Battle of Panipat

• The use of firearms by Babur’s army enabled them to win the Battle of Panipat.
• The Lodi soldiers lacked the necessary artillery expertise. The sound of cannons startled the war elephants of Lodi.
• Rather than the superiority of his opponents’ weapons, Babur’s superior tactical abilities were a major factor in his victory. Babur’s clever troop placement allowed them to defeat such a formidable Lodi force.
• Babur employed two unique tactics in this first Panipat battle: the Tulghuma and the Araba.
• The division of the army into left, right, and center units is referred to as Tulghuma. The weapon carts were mentioned by Araba.
• Babur skillfully divided the Lodi soldiers with this deadly combination.

Significance of the First Battle of Panipat

1. Consolidation of the Mughal Empire

The first Battle of Panipat allowed the Mughal dynasty to expand its role in northern India. The desire of Babur to rule the east of the Indus had come true. A new era in medieval history started. However, there were some challenges in the consolidation. Babur kept fighting with Rajput and Afghans to save the seats at Khanua and Gogra. But he passed before the consolidation of the Mughal empire. Then, Humayun became the ruler, and he faced several conflicts and defeats from Sher Shah Suri. But Akbar consolidated the position of the Mughal empire with his caliber and strength.

2. Decline of the Delhi Sultanate

The Lodi dynasty lost its rule over Delhi and Agra, and the Lodi dynasty came to an end. It was the only Afghan empire in the Delhi Sultanate. The Delhi Sultanate had been weakening since the start of the Sayyid dynasty. There were many treasures deposited by Ibrahim Lodi at Agra. Babur captured those treasures and freed himself from the financial difficulties. The struggle for supremacy started in north India, which marked a new phase. The Battle of Khanwa with Rana Sanga was one such war due to regional fragmentation.

3. Impact on Indian Subcontinent’s Political Landscape

Regional kingdoms also witnessed shifts in the power dynamics due to power shifting. Babur got new land for rule. They established the Mughal Empire, which ruled for 300 years. It had set new standards for warfare by introducing guns and artillery. It brought Central Asian influence on the Indian subcontinent.

First Battle of Panipat Aftermath

Babur’s conquest marked the beginning of a new chapter in the history of medieval India by toppling the Delhi sultanate and establishing the Mughal dynasty. Babur survived to deal with Afghan and Rajput challenges to his positions at Khanua and Gogra, but he died before consolidating his victories. His son Humayun faced a resurgent Afghan threat under Sher Shah. Akbar, Babur’s grandson, undertook the task of overseeing the final consolidation of the Mughal dynasty Empire. The use of elephants as India’s primary weapon of war came to an end with the Battle of Panipat, which marked the official dawn of the gunpowder era.

Second Battle of Panipat (1556)

The second Battle of Panipat was fought between Hemu and Akbar on November 5, 1556. Hemu was the Hindu ruler who ruled north India. The Akbar army defeated Hemu’s army, and the credit went to General Khan Zaman 1 and Bairam Khan. On January 24, 1556, Mughal emperor Humayun was replaced by Akbar after his death. The 13-year-old king had 5000 guard soldiers stationed safely from the Warfield.

The army of Hemu consisted of 1500 war elephants and led his army himself. Hemu had 30.000 horsemen composed of Rajputs and Afghans. When Hemu’s army was about to rout Akbar’s army, one arrow passed his brain clean out from the cup of his head. Hemu’s army was defeated in this disarray and confusion. He was captured by Shah Quli Khan and presented before Akbar.

Third Battle of Panipat (1761)

The third Battle of Panipat was held on 14 January 1761 between the Maratha empire and the King of Afghanistan, Ahmad Shah Durrani. The Rohilla Afghan of Doab and Nawab of Awadh were part of this war. Sada Shiv Rao was the commander of the Maratha army. Historians consider this battle as one of the largest battles fought in the 18th century. This battle had seen the largest number of fatalities. There were no supplies to the Marathas, and the soldiers were dying. The army of Marathas asked the commander to die on the battlefield instead of starvation.

The battle involved 125,000 troops. Losses can be seen on both sides. Around 60,000 – 70,000 were killed in the battle. The defeat of Marthas halted their expansion in north India for 10 years. Northern territories were destabilized. Around 40,000 Maratha prisoners were slaughtered in cold blood the day after the battle. After 10 years, Peshwa Madhavrao established the Maratha empire in 1771.

Panipat Wars Dates table

War	Date
First Battle of Panipat	April 21, 1526
Second Battle of Panipat	November 5, 1556
Third Battle of Panipat	January 14, 1761

Also Read:-

Kalinga War: Understanding Causes, Facts and Importance

Second Battle of Panipat (1556): An Overview

Third Battle of Panipat (1761)

Comparing the Three Battles of Panipat

We can compare the 3 Battles of Panipat on the following basis:

1. Military Strategies and Innovations

In the first Battle of Panipat, Babur’s military strategies and innovations were the main reason for the defeat of Ibrahim Lodi’s army. The use of gunpowder and artillery impacted the first battle. The second battle had seen standard usage of cavalry, and this battle solidified Akbar’s position as a Mughal emperor. The Maratha strategies in the third Battle of Panipat involved a strong defensive position, elephant corps, and cavalry charge. The Afghan rulers used diversionary tactics.

2. Socio-Political Context and Stakeholders

The socio-political context was different in all the three wars. In the first battle of Panipat, many regional rulers supported Babur due to the unpopularity of Ibrahim Lodi. Babur invaded India from Central Asia. Major stakeholders were Babur and the ruler of the Delhi Sultanate, Ibrahim Lodi, along with many regional powers.

In the second battle of Panipat, Akbar was a minor during the war, and his regent, Bairam Khan, led the war. Hemu was the Hindu king who wanted to revive the indigenous rule in north India. Major stakeholders were AKbar, Hemu, Bairam Khan, and various regional rulers. In the third Battle of Panipat, the Maratha faced challenges internally as well as externally. Many regional powers conflicted with the Marathas, which was the major factor behind the lack of unity in the war. Major stakeholders were Marathas, Ahmad Shah Durrani, and regional powers like the Mughals, Rajputs, and Jats.

3. Long-Term Impact on Indian History

All the battles had long-term impacts on Indian history. The first Battle of Panipat established the Mughal dynasty and saw the downfall of the Lodi dynasty. The Mughals impacted Indian history in many ways, like culture, politics, and administration. The second Battle of Panipat holds importance as it consolidated the Mughal dynasty in North India and provided stability to the rulers. The policies of Akbar introduced religious tolerance and administrative reforms.

The third Battle of Panipat weakened the Marathas and deepened the roots of British rulers. Regional fragmentation weakened the socio-economic condition of the Indian subcontinent. These Battles were turning points in the history of India.

Conclusion 

Panipat was an entrance to Delhi, but it was never the reason for dispute in any battle. Have you ever wondered why all the Battles of Panipat happened at Panipat? This could be due to strategic location, political significance, and neutral ground status. Situated on the banks of the Yamuna River, it offers an ideal location for the easy movement of troops and supplies.

It was located at the confluence of many kingdoms of Delhi, Agra, and Jaipur, so power rivalry was common. Political pressure exerted less influence on it because it resided far from the power centers of various kingdoms. History always gives some learning. The Battles of Panipat also left some lessons and legacies behind it. The Panipat wars 1, 2, and 3 taught us management skills and the importance of modern tactics. The battles laid the groundwork for Babur’s successors, and Akbar got the opportunity to expand its territories and consolidate the dynasty into a powerful empire.

Frequently Asked Questions: Battle of Panipat